On 0, Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please reread my message. I would like not to bump the soname, since > there is nothing to bump soname for. >
Right. I'll reread the patches then. My eyes saw: > * The soname of liblzma (upstream, at least) will be liblzma.so.5. and my disk said "liblzma.so.2". They started to fight each other and I had to answer quickly. > > FWIW, The list of reverse dependencies is: > > I am not _that_ stupid, you know. > Please, don't misunderstand my message. I listed the reverse dependencies for other people reading the buglog to be able to have a quick idea on what it is about. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
