On 08/10/2010 11:55 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:09:04PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >>> - Decide where user feedback will have to go; the obvious answer is the >>> BTS, but we need to decide whether reuse some existing (pseudo) >>> package or create a new one for the occasion. IMHO it should be >>> something quite obvious for the users such as "squeeze" or >>> "squeeze-upgrades" or something like that. >> There is upgrade-reports just for that reason... > > Oh, right, I apologize for my ignorance of that package. What is the > appropriate way to tag upgrade reports so that we can easily filter on > lenny->squeeze upgrades or alternatively filter out past unrelated > reports?
I guess it would be best if they get a tag lenny or get closed when they are not about upgrades to squeeze. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
