On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:23:11 -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 11:41 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > To prevent issues such as this in the future, would it make sense to > > force rebuilds on the buildds for the uploaded architecture? This > > would make sure that all binary packages are built from source in the > > correct environment. It also addresses a lack of build logs for those > > archs. > > For the record, I am in favor of this idea. I am aware, though, that we > have been over this topic many times, and disallowing source uploads or > discarding/building the uploaded binary packages has never been in the > winning side, so *shrug* =)
Just curious, what are the arguments against it? I can only think of the obvious: more jobs to run on the buildds (and thus longer waits for builds in general). I'd be interested in reading the old discussion. Do you have any links? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
