On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Michael Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 19:45:08 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As per bug 592071, it seems that deborphan shoudn't be in squeeze >> without a maintainer who'll take care of it. I'm ccing the maintainers >> of the depending packages to see if they'd be interested in taking it >> over. If I don't hear anything in a week, I'll go ahead and remove it >> from testing. > > I'll adopt it if thats what's needed, but I would prefer to co-maintain > it. I personally don't see bug #592068 as severe, and I don't see any > other critical issues with the package right now, so I don't really > understand the maintainer's dire tone. I think the package is fine > as-is for squeeze. > > Mike Well, I would like to maintain it too, but I'm not sure to have the needed knowledge. I think Mike's opinions are right and I really don't understand maintainer's decision.
Devid > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
