On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:31:02PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 15:05:45 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 08:50:46 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > > > > > > * [e8b6b49] gbp-pq: Use the maintainer of the Debian package as > > > > fallback > > > > patch author > > > > > > Not sure I understand why this is better than using git's default as > > > author. > > Note that this is only for patches that don't carry any header > > information in the patch header - which is often that case if patches > > aren't generated from git. > > In this case git-quiltimport would ask for the patch author, that's why > > we default to the maintainer. In case we can't determine the maintainer > > (like in the case Mehdi pointed out) we fall back to prompting. > > Once the patches got imported they cary correct author information and > > the passed information is ignored by git-quiltimport. > > > Fair enough. > > > > > > > > * [af2a435] gbp-pull: Don't update already up to date branches > > > > > > > > Since this is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies it should be > > > > safe. > > > > > > Well, if people use it to prepare their package it's better if it keeps > > > working... > > > > > > Quick question: > > > > > > --- git-buildpackage-0.5.3/gbp/gbp_version.py 1970-01-01 > > > 00:00:00.000000000 +0000 > > > +++ git-buildpackage-0.5.4/gbp/gbp_version.py 2010-08-06 > > > 20:14:08.000000000 +0000 > > > @@ -0,0 +1 @@ > > > +gbp_version="0.5.4~1.gbp88afa6" > > > > > > what is this for? (is it intended?) > > The file is autogenerated, so it doesn't matter. > > Then presumably it shouldn't be in the source package? Yes. I'll remove this in further uploads. Thanks for pointing this out. -- Guido
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
