Den 21. aug. 2010 10:55, skrev Stephen Kitt:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 04:02:37AM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote:
Den 21. aug. 2010 03:01, skrev Svante Signell:
Please take this request seriously. Even if Squeeze is frozen,
distributing the same version (1.0.x) of Wine as Lenny does not look
good! People are trying to help out!
I wouldn't hold much hope. These are the options:
1. Get wine-gecko built on Debian. Apparently gcc-mingw32 4.4.4 did
not solve all the problems with it, gcc-mingw32 would apparently
have to be upgraded all the way to 4.5.0 to build a fully working
package. Not sure if the release team will accept that, and even if
they did, packaging Wine 1.2 for squeeze will, by now, be a rush job
that may result in a package with serious problems.
Have you had a chance to take a look at my packages? I took the time
to separate each patch out so that you'd be able to integrate them
into your git tree without to much trouble.
I'll take a look when the time comes. Until gcc-mingw32 is updated,
there's not much that can be done anyway.
Note that I already did some preliminary work a while ago (including a
complete wine-gecko package, just waiting for a working compiler), and
have had some long-term plans for the Wine package itself, and probably
not in the direction you might expect or have worked on. So I might not
have use for such patches, but we'll see when it finally becomes
possible to update Wine.
For now, I suggest working on a working gcc-mingw32, if anything.
Note that building wine-gecko also requires an updated version of
mingw-w64 (used to produce an updated replacement for
mingw32-runtime).
My own wine-gecko package does not need this. (Though if mingw32-runtime
were to be updated, its build system could be simplified a bit, I guess.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c6f9c83.6070...@arcticnet.no
