On Aug 27, 2010, at 12:39 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 00:16 +0200, Adrian Glaubitz wrote: >> A big "Thank You" to both of you guys for your efforts to have "kcemu" fixed >> before the release of Squeeze! I'm looking forward to testing everything >> finally once Squeeze is stable. >> >> I have seen that the updated package (0.5.1-2) shows up in Debian >> incoming but not yet in unstable. Does it need an extra unfreeze for >> the package to propagate? > > What makes you think it's not in unstable? > > a...@kaa:~$ apt-cache policy kcemu > kcemu: > Installed: (none) > Candidate: 0.5.1+dfsg-2 > Version table: > 0.5.1+dfsg-2 0 > 500 http://ftp.uk.debian.org unstable/contrib Packages
Ah, very tricky. I only checked the webpage as my Debian box is currently off: <http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=kcemu&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all> This one lists: sid (unstable) (otherosfs): KC 85/4 emulator [contrib] 0.5.1+dfsg-1: alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc While following the link to the package: <http://packages.debian.org/sid/kcemu> "Package: kcemu (0.5.1+dfsg-2 and others) [contrib]" Obviously the search database didn't get updated. Anyway, it's in. Thanks Adam for pointing this out! Regards, Adrian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
