On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:24AM -0400, Ariel wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:46:39AM -0400, Ariel wrote: > > >Are you volunteering to make all packages depending on xulrunner and > >libmozjs build and properly work with the xulrunner and libmozjs > >versions corresponding to iceweasel 3.6? Only once all that is done > >maybe the release team can decide squeeze would be better with iceweasel > >3.6. Not before. > > Why do you need just xulrunner-1.9.2 in squeeze? I have both > xulrunner-1.9.2 (3.6) and xulrunner-1.9.1 (3.5) installed, and > everything seems to work just fine. Same with libmozjs2d and > libmozjs3d - I have both installed.
Are you volunteering to support both xulrunner-1.9.1 and xulrunner-1.9.2 for squeeze lifetime ? Oh by the way, getting iceweasel 3.6 in would mean getting icedove 3.1 in, too, and iceape 2.0 out, for the same reason: we can't support more than one mozilla codebase for the lifetime of a release. Except if people volunteer and actually support them (because saying "I'll do", and not actually doing it is too easy). Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
