[dropped ftp-master from recipients, and re-ordered] On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:48:13 +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote: > > Please allow libaddressable-ruby[1] to get into squeeze , its one > > of the dependency for libdataobjects-ruby[2] [...] > Why does this require a new package, and why was the breakage not > caught before now?
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 00:09 +0530, Deepak Tripathi wrote: > It is one of the dependencies for libdataobjects-ruby[1]. As soon as > bug was raised package was created and asked for sponsorship. > > It got delayed because i was on vacation and when i was back to work I > had resolved this. > > It is one of the run time dependencies. That wasn't the question, at least as I understood it. libdataobjects-ruby 0.10.2-1 had been in the archive for nearly three months by the time that #593085 was filed. If the package was unusable without libaddressable-ruby, how did no-one notice before that? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
