On 09/09/2010 09:08 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> 1) Why not using the "patch" target from >> /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make? > > Sorry, I tried "patch-stamp" instead as I wrongly remembered, it > didn't work, I got pissed, so did like that (too fast, thinking > wrongly that it was acceptable). I'll upload a fix, thanks for your > remark. >
Ok. >> 2) + * Bumps Standard-Version to 3.9.1. >> >> Not needed. >> >> 3) + * Added debian/source/format and debian/README.source >> >> Not needed. >> > > Other release team members never complained about the above changes, > and I saw people on IRC saying that 2) was fine, and wild-guessed > that 3) was ok. > People? Never say never (Example: [1]). Besides, acceptable changes are described in [2]. [1] <[email protected]> [2] <[email protected]> > I'm not saying you are wrong, Il ne manquerait plus que ça. > but rather I'm asking: do you want me to reverse these changes, and > re-upload to SID without them (and the debian/rules change)? > It's ok for this upload. No need to revert what's already done. But, be aware of that for next time. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
