Another point I want to claim is that, FC13 can not boot up successfully with 2.11.8 driver. With the gamma patch in 2.11.9, the driver can work. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-geode/commit/?id=2bcbc0b64091218d348ad9f699370e4bfde3948b
Frank > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Cristau [mailto:jcris...@debian.org] > Sent: 2010?9?3? 20:10 > To: Martin-Éric Racine > Cc: Huang, FrankR; Otavio Salvador; debian-release; Cui, Hunk > Subject: Re: Unblock xserver-xorg-video-geode > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 14:38:21 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 09:33:19 +0800, Huang, FrankR wrote: > > > > > >> Otavio, > > >> > > >> I saw this thread from top to the end. > > >> Is it because the patch > > >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video- > geode/commit/?id=e9447f5335681a78cf87ebf8c9659a6fecfc9746 > > >> block the geode driver to be accepted? > > >> If that is so, can we agree with the suggestion from Julien? > > >> if ((pGeode->Output & (OUTPUT_PANEL | OUTPUT_DCON)) == > > >> (OUTPUT_PANEL | OUTPUT_DCON)) > > >> > > > Well, or you could make it if (pGeode->Output == (OUTPUT_PANEL | > > > OUTPUT_DCON)). Or alternatively, explain why the existing code is > > > correct. > > > > We'll discuss this particular one with Otavio and let him comment on > > the solution. > > > OK. > > > > Another question is whether your EXA composite paths are reliable > enough > > > now, or whether we'd better disable them for release. > > > > I would say that they are a million times better than they were in > > 2.11.8 but I don't discount the fact that a few issues remain to iron > > out. At the very least, a large number of rendering issues that had > > been bugging users for the last two years are finally resolved and > > this, IMHO, is a good enough reason to allow 2.11.9 into Squeeze. This > > being said, it could very well be that a few issues that Julien > > brought up need to be addressed before it happens. > > > I'd be ok with allowing 2.11.9 in squeeze once the above is clarified or > fixed, with the understanding that exa composite acceleration will be > disabled if more issues are reported before release. Does that work for > you? > > > Conversely, we'd appreciate if bug #567909 would finally be resolved > > on time for Squeeze. > > > Fixed in git. Guess it slipped through the cracks. > > Cheers, > Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/dd1cc71b621b004fa76856e5129d6b170334d...@sbjgexmb1.amd.com