On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:39:31PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > [Note; this has been discussed before, but there never was a > real conclusion, but we need to discuss/fix this for Squeeze]:
As discussed we can retain clamav in stable under the assumption that the maintainer help with preparing new clamav upstream versions for stable. Security updates will also use new upstream versions as seen fit. The amount of rdeps is minimized for the squeeze cycle to lower the impact of ABI bumps. Kind regards, Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
