On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 23:17 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > - I have missed the deadline only for few days (12 days, right?). Before > that, the RT had more relaxed rules since the debconf10 announcement, > which was a surprise for some.
We apparently have different definitions of "few"; mailing 12 days after the initial freeze announcement is quite different from mailing 12 days after the announcement of the more restrictive approach. > - PHP 5.3 has been sent to SID/Testing just few days before the freeze. The upload history of the php5 package disagrees with you. 5.3.1 was originally uploaded to unstable in early February, and 5.3.2 in March; 5.3.2-1 migrated to testing in April. > We all have to make sure that > our packages are in good shape for this new version of PHP. Surely it would have been better if this had not been left so late in the cycle? > If the RT > wasn't ready to accept the consequences of such a big move, then maybe > it wasn't a good idea to upload PHP 5.3.2? Please could you explain this comment? As above, PHP 5.3.2 has been in unstable since March, and testing since April; that was the maintainers' decision and not something that required the Release Team to be "ready to accept the consequences". Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1284317091.22294.10545.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
