On 15.09.2010 23:24, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 07:32:08PM +0000, Oliver Korff wrote: >> crafty (23.3-1~squeeze1) testing-proposed-updates; urgency=low >> . >> * libnuma1 had a "New Upstream Version" upload and is not getting >> into squeeze. So I prepared a testing-proposed-updates >> upload/backport with the old lib-numa to make the crafty package >> use the squeeze version of this lib. > > What's that supposed to mean? Did you get prior approval by > [email protected] for this upload?
Hi, I saw, that my fix for the FTBFS-bug in the package could not enter testing, even after the unblock of the release-team. This is caused by a new upload of libnuma1: http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/crafty.html testing migration excuses: Section: non-free/games - 26 days old (needed 10 days) - Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by zobel - Valid candidate - Invalidated by dependency - Not considered - Depends: crafty numactl (not considered) So I privately asked zobel from the release-team, how to proceed. He told me that I could upload a ~squeeze1 package (built in a testing chroot) to testing-proposed-updates. I didn't unnderstand, that the e-mail to [email protected] was mandatory and misunderstood the developer reference: "After uploading and successful build on all platforms, contact the release team at <[email protected]> and ask them to approve your upload." Here it says "after uploading..." This is my first release-cycle and I am sorry to cause more workload to the release-team and promise to do better next time. Keep up the good work... Oliver -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
