Hi, * The Anarcat <[email protected]> [2010-09-22 00:32]: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 01:16:39AM +0300, Jonathan Nieder wrote: [...] > > * would set a weird precedent for errata that did not come about in > > fixing a security-related bug > > The regression was introduce by fixing a security-related bug which was > bundled in a stable point-release instead of a regular security upgrade > (which is a source of confusion for me in the first place). > > > If I ran the world or had infinite time, I'd suggest a stable point > > release with just the binnmu, which has none of those problems. > > > > Release managers: would that or something similar be feasible? > > Thanks for the time taken to consider my objections.
Can we (security team) release such a binNMU through a second revision of this DSA? I'm really not sure what the proper way would be but right now that is the one making the most sense to me. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://www.ngolde.de - [email protected] - GPG: 0xA0A0AAAA For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
pgpuxw79DVJ1s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
