Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:00:54 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#597243: unblock: shutdown-qapps/1.4.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597243,
regarding unblock: shutdown-qapps/1.4.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
597243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597243
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package shutdown-qapps
Since version 1.2.5-1 of the source package shutdown-qapps
there have been many changes in both qshutdown and
qprogram-starter. Among these changes there were some
serious problems fixed.
For example qprogram-starter didn't log the error output for the
second process. Thus I've split both output files each into two
for the two processes and fixed the problem.
Another problem was that sometimes the wrong
error message boxes were shown, because many programs return
different error codes for similar errors. I've reduced the
error message boxes to two. One for "no such program or command"
and one for "invalid parameters or options". The remaining errors
will be shown in the errorLog files (if logging is enabled).
I've raised the usability for both programs and added a calendar for
qshutdown.
unblock shutdown-qapps/1.4.4-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers lucid-updates
APT policy: (500, 'lucid-updates'), (500, 'lucid-security'), (500,
'lucid-proposed'), (500, 'lucid-backports'), (500, 'lucid')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-25-generic (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 22/09/2010 00:38, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> Given that shutdown-qapps wasn't included in previous releases and a
> backported fix seems not possible, maybe it's worth considering whether
> we really want to include the package in a stable release at the moment.
>
Removal hint added.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---
