On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 21:49 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:33:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 21:09 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:01:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > debian/pyversions in the source package contains "2.5".
> > > 
> > > Oops, that slipped through. I'm going to use "2.6-" in debian/pyversions.
> > 
> > If the package supports python 2.5 (which the current dependencies
> > rather suggest it does) would "2.5-" not be better?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Apologies if this is a silly question and I'm missing a reason not to do so.
> 
> Sorry for rushing a reply before thinking :)

No worries :-)  Please feel free to upload the previous patch plus this
change.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to