Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:56:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Now, I hope someone from the release team will answer this: if we build >> a new xen-pv-grub package, will it be accepted by the RT, even if we are >> late, as the lack of pv-grub in the xen-utils can be considered a >> regression in Squeeze (as Lenny had the feature)? > > AFAICS there was no pv-grub in Lenny: > > pk...@franck:~/ftp/ftp/dists/lenny$ zgrep pv-grub Contents-amd64.gz > Contents-i386.gz > pk...@franck:~/ftp/ftp/dists/lenny$ > > If this is the case, there's no regression. Furthermore this is a bug of > severity:wishlist, so no, it would be too late for this. > > Kind regards, > Philipp Kern
Considering that here: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/PvGrub it's written that PvGrub is replacing pygrub, and that in Lenny (unless there's still pygrub in Squeeze, but my understanding is that it's not there anymore): # dpkg -S /usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/bin/pygrub xen-utils-3.2-1: /usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/bin/pygrub yes, it's a regression !!! Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
