On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 08:24 +0200, Thomas Müller wrote: > > Am 06.10.2010 um 23:07 schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]>: > > This is broken: > > > > +quassel (0.6.3-1) testing; urgency=high [...] > > +quassel (0.7.0-1) unstable; urgency=low [...] > > since 0.6.3-1 is not a descendent of 0.7.0-1. Aside from confusing > > those reading the changelog, it also subverts the BTS's ability to > > derive the presence and fixed state of bugs in the package. [...] > Thanks for letting me know. > I was expecting chronological order.
As they're different branches, I assume the 0.6.3 package doesn't actually include the new upstream which would have been 0.7.0-1? > Ill fix this and upload 0.6.3-2, right? Sounds good; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
