Mehdi,
Thanks.
The mentioned changes look ok. But, I noticed that there were several
files deleted from the source tarball. I realize that 0.1 contained some
cruft and 0.1+nmu1 fixed that (which is a good thing). If you have
several orig tarballs, you should use the source format 3.0 for this
package (not during the freeze of cours :p or in experimental if you
want) and I don't understand yet why it's a native package.
The package is a bundle of related modules some of which would be too
small to get into Debian otherwise.
Besides, I'm curious why the maintainer sponsored an NMU of his own package?
I prepared the release and as I was not an uploader it came up as an NMU.
Version 0.2
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 10/14/2010 12:01 AM, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
I have prepared an file and hopefully Jaldhar will upload it into
unstable and we can proceed from there. For your benefit I include
the diff. Most of it is of course the Creative Commons license.
The mentioned changes look ok. But, I noticed that there were several
files deleted from the source tarball. I realize that 0.1 contained some
cruft and 0.1+nmu1 fixed that (which is a good thing). If you have
several orig tarballs, you should use the source format 3.0 for this
package (not during the freeze of cours :p or in experimental if you
want) and I don't understand yet why it's a native package.
Besides, I'm curious why the maintainer sponsored an NMU of his own package?
… unblocked.
Regards,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cc13904.80...@periapt.co.uk
