Hi Bernd, On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Give it more time for testing in unstable then.
That's one of the things that's being considered, if you'd carefully read the thread. > Virtualbox is important enough to have the latest version of it in the > next release. >From someone's perspective, every package is important enough to have the latest version in the next release. Our job, unfortunately, is to ensure the stability of the release as a whole, not one particular package. > Remember that the SC says something about doing the best for our > users, Um... I don't think I can reply sensibly to this point. > not being able to review every single patch. It is a bugfix release > from upstream and not something which adds a lot of new features and > the changes are well documented. I think we can both agree that there are a *lot* of new changes. > You could at least have asked if there is away to get a > reviable list of patches. Really a shame that Debian will ship with a large > number of bugs in an important piece of software again. > Again, I'm not going to be able to comment sensibly on this section. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
