On 11/01/2010 01:21 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: > > JFTR: bti would already (build-)depend on it if it had been around > longer :) >
Sure :) > (In fact I have a package ready with the new upstream release of bti > which uses liboauth). > >>> libOAuth was accepted very recently into Debian Unstable, and that >>> is why it isn't in squeeze yet. >> Then, we won't be able to accept it in Squeeze I'm afraid. > > Right, that's totally understandable. > > I guess this is one of the cornercases where we have to sacrifice > an improvement in a small corner in order to improve the larger good > (i.e. get out the release without unnecessary delays and risk for the > quality). > What are the other clients that may use liboauth? Is bti the only one? Liboauth was just released… how much testing did it get? Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
