On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 18:55 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 03:36:26PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > So far as I can see, Gennaro's modification to the second init script - > > as is - doesn't make sense. It adds $LIBDIR to LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but > > never defines LIBDIR. > > > > I'd be happy with either reverting the modification to the > > slurm-llnl-slurmdbd init script, or adding the definition of LIBDIR to > > it (bringing it closer to upstream), but doing one without the other > > seems wrong; > > True, I prefere to stay closer to upstream, therefore it would be better > to define LIBDIR on the top of the script. > > I have made new packages for both unstable > > http://www.na.icar.cnr.it/~oliva/debs/repository-20101106/ > > and testing > > http://www.na.icar.cnr.it/~oliva/debs/stable-20101106/
Thanks. The unstable packages do include the LIBDIR definition, but afaics the same change hasn't been made to the packages for testing? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
