On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 17:22 +0300, Erinn Clark wrote: > * Dererk <[email protected]> [2010:11:28 15:25 -0300]: > > I'm on the way to find out if there's a simple way to backport the "fix" > > (which I doubt it would be clean), but at this point I'm really > > convinced that its a better idea to let the version at unstable > > (0.2.10-3) to get into, since it's just one version away from TPU's > > (0.2.9-1) and a version that is mostly based on fixing this problem (see > > attached changelog), has been extensively tested for longer than 2 > > months at unstable, with no mayor issues and none pending. > > I too think that it would be better for Vidalia 0.2.10-3 to go into stable. > Previous versions of Vidalia were using a geoip server which has now been > taken > offline (forever) and they will be missing functionality and trying to reach > something that no longer exists. Please use the version in unstable.
This would be geoips.vidalia-project.net and the rewrites of network/GeoIp*? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
