Your message dated Fri, 10 Dec 2010 08:44:14 -0000
with message-id
<[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#606384: unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606384,
regarding unblock: collectd/4.10.1-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
606384: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=606384
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog 4.10.1-1+squeeze1
and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason Steffen NMUd the unstable
version.
RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as 4.10.1-1+squeeze2
unblock collectd/4.10.1-2.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, lc_ctype=de_de.iso-8859...@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, December 9, 2010 07:02, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:03:17PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 21:10 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>> > > Please unblock package collectd. Judging by the changelog
>> > > 4.10.1-1+squeeze1 and 4.10.1-2 look alike, but for some reason
>> Steffen
>> > > NMUd the unstable version.
>> > >
>> > > RMs, can 4.10.1-2.1 be unblocked or should this be fixed as
>> > > 4.10.1-1+squeeze2
>> >
>> > Unfortunately it will need to go through t-p-u. Although the source
>> > packages were identical other than the changelogs, the reason that
>> > +squeeze1 was t-p-u-ed is that the collectd binary package Recommends:
>> > libesmtp6 which doesn't (and won't) exist in squeeze.
>>
>> Steffen, can you rebuild your NMU for t-p-u, then?
> Yes, I can upload to t-p-u, but not before tomorrow. If someone wants to
> beat me to it, feel free.
I've just approved collectd 4.10.1-1+squeeze2; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
