Mehdi, thank you for your mail.
If you were aware of the mentors.debian.net package and the discussion then why ask the question in the way you asked it? I have received no further replies to my last message and certainly nothing that would made me reconsider my position. If anything I should be the one asking those questions. On 12.12.2010 18:57, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > Well, I did check the package on mentors and it doesn't match what we asked. And I explained my position as package maintainer that I do not intend to bring the dependency on makedev or udev back. I don't feel to repeat my arguments here, but I feel the need to repeat that I stand by them. The more I think about it the more arguemnts I find against bringing back that incorrect dependency. It would be just plain silly, it seems. Take 2-7 which has no RC-relevant bug or use 2-8 from mentors if you prefer that. At this point, I'm strictly against anything else. My strong preference is for the current 2-8 up at mentors to make it for squeeze. Regards Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
