Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:14:50 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#607255: RM: trac-datefieldplugin/0.7782-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #607255,
regarding RM: trac-datefieldplugin/0.7782-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
607255: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607255
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: rm
Hi!
The named package in testing is affected by rc bug #603076 (installation
failure) and important bug #581486 (bashism in debian/rules). In a private
reply to my request, the maintainer basically answered, that he is not
sure, if he will have the time, to investigate what was broken.
Considering, that trac-datefieldplugin was not part of a stable release and
has quite low popcon, removing it from testing for now seems like a viable
choice.
Best regards,
Alexander
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/16/2010 11:00 AM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: rm
>
>
> Hi!
>
> The named package in testing is affected by rc bug #603076 (installation
> failure) and important bug #581486 (bashism in debian/rules). In a private
> reply to my request, the maintainer basically answered, that he is not
> sure, if he will have the time, to investigate what was broken.
>
> Considering, that trac-datefieldplugin was not part of a stable release and
> has quite low popcon, removing it from testing for now seems like a viable
> choice.
>
Removal hint added.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---
