On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Olaf van der Spek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt > <[email protected]> wrote: >> That's fine, but I do question why it had to been done now... the old >> method worked fine, and by changing it during freeze the diff has been >> made quite noisy for no visible benefit, making reviewing it more work. >> >> Looking more closely at the diff, not only was the above not mentioned >> in the changelog, but nor was the addition of conf-available files for >> 10-evasive, 10-flv-streaming and 10-usertrack. If these changes are >> important enough to be included at this stage of the freeze, why have >> they neither been mentioned nor documented? > > I'm not sure why Krzysztof included those in the upload. They had been > comitted to SVN already, but they're not required for Squeeze.
Could this go into Squeeze? If not, should a new version be created with just the fix for this bug? Olaf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
