Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Tuesday, den 25. January 2011: > On Sat, January 15, 2011 09:52, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > Adam D. Barratt schrieb am Saturday, den 15. January 2011: > > > >> On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 10:29 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> > Konstantin Khomoutov schrieb am Thursday, den 13. January 2011: > >> > > >> > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 13:24:10 +0100 > >> > > Alexander Wirt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > Any new about the NMU? > >> [...] > >> > > The source package's URL (ready for `dget`) is [1]. > >> > > > >> > > 1. > >> http://sites.google.com/site/khomoutov/debian/ndoutils_1.4b9-1.1.dsc > >> > Uploaded. > >> > >> Thanks; unblocked. > > Great! > > Unfortunately, I failed to notice that this isn't as straight forward as > it seemed. The version of nagios3 which is in unstable has built binary > packages for kfreebsd-*, whereas the package in testing has not. This > means that the kfreebsd-* ndoutils packages depend on nagios3 and britney > is refusing to migrate the package as they would be uninstallable. > > So far as I can see, the possible options are: > > - release without ndoutils after all > - get the kfreebsd-* ndoutils packages removed from unstable > - use the largest hammer britney has to force the packages in regardless, > and then ask ftpmaster to remove the kfreebsd-* binaries > - upload ndoutils built against testing's nagios3 to t-p-u, with a version > number such as 1.4b9-1.1~squeeze1, in order to be lower than the unstable > version > > My preference would be for the final option, assuming the upload could be > performed soon. I'm currently on the road til friday, but I'll see what I can do.
Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
