Your message dated Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:02:02 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#612581: release.debian.org: volatile.debian.org and
all mirrors have stable pointing to lenny and not squeeze.
has caused the Debian Bug report #612581,
regarding release.debian.org: volatile.debian.org and all mirrors have stable
pointing to lenny and not squeeze.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
612581: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612581
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: serious
Justification: 2
just what i say in the subject: volatile.debian.org stable does not point to
squeeze, actually in no mirror i even found the squeeze directory !!
(if it not pertinent redirect to the right pseudopackage ... i had doubt among
this, general an www.debian.org)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 15:52 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 12:38:27PM +0100, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> > There is another problem:
> > if i follow the above link and go to
> > www.debian.org/volatile I receive a page (saying updated on
> > 7/2/2011) mentioning:
> > deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile squeeze/volatile main
> > contrib non-free
> > (and more broken links).
>
> I updated a whole bunch of links on that page now. Visible within four hours
> I
> guess, although I didn't see the result yet.
It all looks okay to me now, so I'm closing this bug. Leonardo, if you
find any remaining issues, please let us know.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
