On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 18:04:29 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote: > > Where did we eventually land on the correct way to make a dependency on > libjpeg's dev package? libtiff4-dev depends on libjpeg-dev (and tiff > build-depends on libjpeg-dev), which I believe was explicitly done > during the libjpeg62 to libjpeg8 transition, which got confused at some > point. Anyway, a user complains in bug 610862 that libtiff4-dev depends > on libjpeg-dev and shouldn't, but before I change it, I wanted to find > out what I should be doing now. I could change to something like > libjpeg-dev | libjpeg8-dev or even to libjpeg8-dev | libjpeg-dev (or the > libjpeg62-dev versions of the above), but I thought by using > libjpeg-dev, I was protecting my package against having to be > re-uploaded in the event of a jpeg transition. I could look at the > current state, but that doesn't necessarily tell me what the long-term > plans are. > That bug is invalid, your package is fine.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
