Mehdi Dogguy writes: Hi,
> > ispell 3.3.02-4, currently staying in sid, Breaks several packages > providing an ispell-dictionary. While I'm sure you have good reasons to > do so, I do wonder if you already talked to other maintainers so that > they start updating their packages. Yes, I informed them about new ispell both after uploading it to experimental [1], and then to unstable [2]. As you can see some dictionaries has already been rebuilt against new ispell. > A quick investigation gives us the list below (list of packages that > need to be updated). Did you try to contact those maintainers, explain > the plan and ask them to update their package? ... and file bugreports? I've just reported RC bugs #623069 to #623075 and upgraded severity of #620182 and #620246. > > As long as this list of packages is not reduced to zero, ispell won't be > able to migrate to testing. Thanks for providing the list of not yet migrated packages. I was about to do this myself few days ago, but was too busy with other stuff. Regards, robert [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-packages/2011/03/msg00064.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa-packages/2011/03/msg00263.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
