Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 13:01:49 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#626690: nmu: ldb transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #626690,
regarding nmu: ldb transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
626690: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626690
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu openchange_1:0.10~bzr1804-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
nmu samba4_4.0.0~alpha14~bzr13684.dfsg1-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
nmu sssd_1.2.1-4.1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna <[email protected]>
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 12:53 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> nmu openchange_1:0.10~bzr1804-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
> nmu samba4_4.0.0~alpha14~bzr13684.dfsg1-1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
> nmu sssd_1.2.1-4.1 . armel . -m 'Rebuild against ldb'
Scheduled, although with s/armel/ALL/g; thanks. (The binaries still
depend on libldb0 on all architectures, regardless of it having
apparently already been removed from unstable on !armel)
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
