Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2011 15:07:20 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#626691: nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #626691,
regarding nmu: rasmol/2.7.5-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
626691: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626691
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu rasmol_2.7.5-3 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against neartree'
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna <[email protected]>
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Il 14/05/2011 13:34, Adam D. Barratt ha scritto:
> Hmmm, rasmol doesn't appear to end up with a binary dependency on
> libcneartree. I wonder if that's a bug, one way or the other.
Indeed, it's probably an oversight my side.
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna <[email protected]>
`. `'
`-
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
