On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 05:27:44PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 19:04 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 04:11:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 19:18 +0200, Guido Günther wrote: [..snip..] > > > - Why was the "$(PRINT_LOADADDR)" makefile target dropped? > > > > It's not needed and unused and was part of the same commit. > > I debated this one - just because it was part of the upstream commit > doesn't automatically make it suitable for inclusion in stable. > However, having checked that it does indeed appear to be unused, I'm not > going to insist that it not be included.
Thanks. Upstream and the Debian maintainer are basically the same person btw. > > > Will the chroots on the autobuilders be updated to the latest arcboot > > before building d-i? Dann raised that issue: > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2011/07/msg00000.html > > I wouldn't expect this to be required. With the widespread use of > LVM-based chroots, the chances of tip22 already being in the chroot used > for the mips d-i build are quite low, so I'd suggest that we work on the > assumption that the correct version will be used - if there turns out to > be an issue for some reason, we can always binNMU d-i on mips and tell > wanna-build to ensure that the new tip22 is used for the build. > > > Find a new diff attached. > > Thanks; please go ahead. Pushed. Thanks again for the review, -- Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
