On 2011-07-16 14:10, Joost Yervante Damad wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:53:03 +0200 > Niels Thykier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: [email protected] >> Usertags: transition >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi >> >> Transition bug for glew; Joost can you follow up if there are any >> thing we should be aware of? > > Normally they should all just build fine. > > Joost >
I have checked the 1.5.8-3 -> 1.6.0-2 diff plus the news from upstream[1] and I get the feeling the SONAME bump is unneeded. in config/version: SO_MAJOR = $(GLEW_MAJOR).$(GLEW_MINOR) [...] LDFLAGS.SO = -shared -Wl,-soname=$(LIB.SONAME) [...] in config/Makefile.linux: LIB.SONAME = lib$(NAME).so.$(SO_MAJOR) I suspect that upstream got the SONAME part wrong here and $(GLEW_MINOR) is not supposed to be in the SONAME. Could you please ask your upstream if they really intended to do a SONAME bump for "minor bug fixes and some new extensions"? ~Niels [1] http://glew.sourceforce.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
