On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 13:52:51 +0200 Niels Thykier <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Joost > > It has come to our attention that you have bumped the SONAME of the > glew libraries. Unfortunately we do not see any records of you > informing us of this library transition. There is now a risk that > this will stall the poppler transition that we were hoping to finish > soon[0]. > > > I will file the transition bug for you this time and I will ask you to > follow up on it with any relevant information you may have. In the > future, please file a transition bug against the pseudo package > release.debian.org (reportbug has a template for it). > Also please verify that the list of affected packages at [1] are > correct. In case we have missed any, please follow up to the > transition bug. Hey Niels, all, reality is perhaps that even though GLEW is a simple package with typically few or no issues for it's dependencies, I guess I'm to detached from the day-to-day evolution of Debian to maintain a package with such a large rev-dep list. This detachment causes me to don't even remember that I have to file a transition bug, etc, ... Maybe I should just file a RFA for it. I'm slowly building down my package list anyway as a gentle way towards retirement. Joost -- Joost Yervante Damad - http://damad.be/joost/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
