On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 20:21 +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > * Adam D. Barratt <[email protected]> [110803 19:50]: > > I'd be happy with the fix for #632749, certainly. What's the practical > > impact of #635553? Particularly given that it is still open in > > unstable, I'm inclined to say we should skip it, at least for the > > moment. > > It's probably harmless, it will just be an extra stat() that will > always fail. If future kernel versions introduce this interface, it > might or might not become a problem.
In that case, let's just stick with #632749 for the moment. Please feel free to upload that (which I assume is the update to gnu-kbsd-version.patch + appropriate changelog stanza). Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
