Hi, I can't let this without answer.
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011, Michael Gilbert wrote: > You could also make a case from a terminological perspective as well. > Unstable is where development in Debian is supposed to happen, so it's > perfectly acceptable to upload unfinished/unstable changes. No, sorry. That's not how we are using unstable. We push there stuff that we believe to be mostly ready for the next stable release. Unfinished/unstable work is supposed to go to experimental. And in the case of dpkg doubly so because it affects everybody. Fortunately multiarch support is not in a poor state and I believe it to be of release quality (and it made a release in Ubuntu and did not generate a flurry of bug reports). Furthermore I don't think that guillem is worried of breaking unstable. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
