On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 06:50 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:33:10PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 07:52 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: [...] > > Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this.
and again :-( - although not quite as long this time, happily... > > > + * Bulk load only helper modules. Linux 3.0 shuffled cpufreq modules > > > + locations a bit and now cpu drivers and helpers are in the same > > > directory > > > + (closes: #636141). > > > + * Use modprobe -b in loadcpufreq to honour blacklisted modules > > > + (closes: #592488). > > > + * Load powernow-k8 for AMD family 20 (i.e. AMD E-350 cpus) > > > + (closes: #627811). > > > + * Stop changing printk levels when loading cpufreq modules (closes: > > > #624575 > > > + and closes: #596235). > > > > I've been debating whether to accept all of the changes, and changed my > > mind a few times while arguing with myself. :-) Have the changes been > > what is your current stance? :) I'm edging towards acking all of them, but it partly depends on: > > tested on a stable system? > > To be honest I haven't tried it myself on a stable system but I'll give > it a go in the next days (towards the weekend most likely). The change > that my have a funny dependency is the "-b" addition to modprobe but > other than that it's all pretty safe and it's mostly removing > unnecessary code or making the find predicate more specific. > On the other hand there are a couple of backports of the whole package > already so I don't expect many surprises. Did you have chance to do the testing you mentioned here? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
