Your message dated Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:02:49 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#649078: binNMU: pyabiword 0.8.0-8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #649078,
regarding binNMU: pyabiword 0.8.0-8.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
649078: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649078
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
Please binnmu pyabiword. Its binary package python-abiword version
0.8.0-8.1 has dependency libabiword-2.9 (= 2.9.1-0.1). However,
sid has
% rmadison -s sid libabiword-2.9
libabiword-2.9 | 2.9.1-0.2 | sid | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64,
kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Thanks -Ralf.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:22:48 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
>
> Please binnmu pyabiword. Its binary package python-abiword version
> 0.8.0-8.1 has dependency libabiword-2.9 (= 2.9.1-0.1). However,
> sid has
>
> % rmadison -s sid libabiword-2.9
> libabiword-2.9 | 2.9.1-0.2 | sid | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64,
> kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
>
Done.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
