On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 08:53:12PM +0000, Adam Barratt wrote: >On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 21:39 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> On 12693 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> >> > From the experience of etch's EOL point release, we'll need a little >> > time to sort out any remaining build issues for security packages after >> > the end of support. The earliest we'd therefore be looking at would be >> > the weekend of 11/12th February. >> >> Does sound fine to me, but do you really want only one week between the >> end of security and the final point release? Its not much time, should >> security really push out something that ends up plenty broken... How >> high THAT possibility is i dont know, but meh. > >It was an absolute earliest date but, yes, we should probably leave a >little longer just in case[tm]. > >To be on the safe side, maybe we should consider weekends between mid >February and mid-to-late March?
That works better for me, yes. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] Mature Sporty Personal More Innovation More Adult A Man in Dandism Powered Midship Specialty -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
