On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 16:02:54 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 10:09:41 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > > On 2011-10-28 Julien Cristau <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > > I'm also not sure what the intention is with libgnutls-dev. Is the plan > > > to have it built from gnutls28 eventually, or keep it in gnutls26? > > > > The main point is to drop gnutls26 eventually. Building libgnutls-dev > > from gnutls28 again will probably be a step on that road. > > > > > What's the "handholding" you refer to above? > > > > * Check license compatibilty. > > * There is API breakage.[1] Some functions have been dropped, > > multithreaded programs usually need a change. > > * Some packages wich use both gcrypt and gnutls directly might need > > not only an added build-dependency on gcrypt but also updated > > autoconf code to add gcrypt, since it is no longer automatically > > pulled in by gnutls. > > > Hrm. This sounds like a major pain... > Actually, thinking more about this, I wonder if we shouldn't just stay away from gnutls28 for wheezy (and maybe going forward, too), because at this point it's pretty clear gnutls26 will need to stay anyway (because not all packages will be ported, and because not all packages will want to go GPL3), and shipping both versions seems like it would have more drawbacks than benefits.
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
