On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Niels Thykier <[email protected]> wrote: > I am okay with starting the transition if you are ready to NMU glame (if > needed) and you (as its maintainer) don't mind beast being uninstallable > in sid for a while (if the oss4 fix is stalled).
I'm not ready with glame, which seems very out-of-date, moreover upstream is no longer active and a big number of many alternatives is available in the archive; I'm CC'ing Daniel, the maintainer of glame, to know what he thinks about the status of the package and whether it would be a good idea to ask ftp-masters for its removal. Regarding beast, we could drop the OSS support until OSS4 is ready. Thanks, -- Alessio Treglia | www.alessiotreglia.com Debian Developer | [email protected] Ubuntu Core Developer | [email protected] 0416 0004 A827 6E40 BB98 90FB E8A4 8AE5 311D 765A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/camhuwozwavb9ersuwxkenpuhwmagmdvvbd0loub+juk-344...@mail.gmail.com
