On 01.02.2012 07:09, [email protected] wrote:
Processing commands for [email protected]:
# Wed Feb 1 07:03:15 UTC 2012
# Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
# http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
#
# Source package in NEW: libfreenect
# Source package in NEW: boost-defaults
[...]
# Source package in NEW: boost-defaults
tags 653823 + pending
Bug #653823 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults
Please don't do that. Aside from being arguably inappropriate (along
with a bunch of other cases in which pseudo-package bugs are closed in
package uploads), it's also wrong...
The base goal of any transition is for a package (or more commonly set
of packages) to migrate to testing. Having the new package accepted in
to unstable is a key step on the path to that goal, but it doesn't
resolve anything in and of itself.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
