On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 04:02:33PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Francesco P. Lovergine <[email protected]> (25/02/2012): > > I'm going to link GeoTiff against the new libtiff5. Of course, the > > Geotiff library does not change its own interface and soname at all, > > but a few rdeps link both GeoTIFF AND the old TIFF, so a similar > > change is requested for those programs. In the meantime, I would > > expect some breakages in those packages which would try linking both > > the new and the old TIFF library. > > (just a quick remark about libtiff4 vs. libtiff5 itself) > > I didn't follow very closely, but I think tiff is getting symbols > versioning; I also think libtiff5 was the first package to have it; so > if packages are rebuilt against a symbols versioning-enable libtiff4 > (which you can track at [1], that should be OK? > > 1. http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libtiff4-symbols.html > > Mraw, > KiBi.
Right, so it should be ok just asking for a set of bNMUs for all packages that both link geotiff and old tiff. -- Francesco P. Lovergine -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
