Your message dated Wed, 04 Apr 2012 11:45:19 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#663632: transition: geos
has caused the Debian Bug report #663632,
regarding transition: geos
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
663632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: [email protected]
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition

Looks like geos changed its SONAME, and in the process dropped -lgeos,
which reverse deps are unhappy with.

transition tracker:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos3.3.1.html

reverse deps:
- basemap FTBFS (#663403)
- osgearth looks ok
- player FTBFS (#662593)
- spatialite-gui FTBFS (no bug report found)
- osmium FTBFS (no bug report found)

Frankie, please file the missing bugs and be prepared to NMU the reverse
deps to get this sorted.

Thanks,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/03/12 21:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: [email protected]
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition

Looks like geos changed its SONAME, and in the process dropped -lgeos,
which reverse deps are unhappy with.

transition tracker:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/geos3.3.1.html


That's pretty much done with osmium's removal… closing.

--
Mehdi


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to