-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Sun, 13 May 2012 23:58:15 +0100 > Von: "Adam D. Barratt" <[email protected]> > An: Ansgar Burchardt <[email protected]> > CC: "Steffen Möller" <[email protected]>, "ftpmaster@debian" > <[email protected]>, Brian Thomason <[email protected]>, > [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Rampart does not migrate - complaining about closed bugs
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 00:37 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > > Steffen Möller <[email protected]> writes: > > > I was sponsoring > > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rampart.html > > > which fixes a number of bugs but does not migrate to testing, even > > > though those bugs are closed. Should we upload another version that > > > closes those bugs in the changelog? > > > > Testing migration is handled by the release team, but I believe you just > > have to mark the bugs as fixed in the last version in the archive. As > > there is another fixed version ("1.3.0-1+rm"), the BTS believes this > > still affects the version currently in unstable. > > Yep, as there's no package in the archive of which 1.3.0-1+rm is an > ancestor. The version graph on the bug report pages shows this - see > the lack of any green and the lack of that version appearing. > > > There's no need to upload a new version just for this, `bts fixed' > > should be enough. > > Indeed. As would having performed a versioned -done back in March - > just using -done with no version information for a bug that you agree > exists in some version of the package is wrong. I think to have done as suggested. The version in unstable in greened for the two bug reports. And nonetheless - a day has passed but no migration and the two bugs are still referenced as novel http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rampart.html Many thanks for your insights Steffen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
