On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 09:45:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 20:42:14 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 20:42 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 16:18:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > In an effort to stop this stalling any further / longer, I propose > > > > sending [1] to each of the port lists, probably some time tomorrow. > > > > > > > > Comments / changes / updates / whatever welcome. > > > > > > > I'd add a concern about the mips buildds to the arch qual page (not sure > > > how to phrase it). > > > > Assuming it's the stability issue, then maybe re-using weasel's > > "unstable under load" which we used for the porter box? > > > There's that, and there's some packages that can only be built on ball > because lucatelli/corelli fail every time. azeem has a bunch of those.
Those were number-crunching testsuites and they timed out - I am not sure what the relative hardware specs are but it could be that corelli is just too slow to run those (likely floating-point heavy) test suites in the sbuild time limit. I haven't looked closer, though. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
