Looks like group reply in my mailer means reply only to the mailing list I have defined a filter for? Anyway, forwarding to debian-release too.
-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: Svante Signell <svante.sign...@telia.com> Reply-to: Svante Signell <svante.sign...@telia.com> To: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: hurd-i386 qualification for Wheezy Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 19:30:47 +0200 On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 18:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 19.05.2012 19:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Very quickly following up on a possible nomenclature issue and a > > couple > > of other things. > > > > On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 17:29 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> - We of course aim at tech preview for wheezy only, not a full > >> release. Our goal is to establish a testing distribution for wheezy > >> which does not block others ports (i.e. so-called fuckedarch), and > >> get > >> a full testing for wheezy+1. > > > > That's not what the phrase "tech preview" was used to mean for > > kfreebsd-* at least. > [...] > > I'm not sure we've ever released with an architecture which was in > > either broken or fucked, but hopefully someone will correct me if I'm > > mistaken on that. > > Anyone? :-) > > Opinions as to whether it makes sense to release an architecture in > either of those states would also be welcome. Is there a definition of what broken and fucked means, so this could be related to. Also, is "tech preview" defined somewhere. Were there any descriptions made/discussions when kFreeBSD was introduced for Squeeze? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1337880927.8802.200.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se
